Can you do physics without maths

Good luck! I think it is not possible for you for further progress because both physics and math are correlated to each other. Any one can not grow up without other. Without math you can not get admission in physics honors. I advice you that you think about another career according to your subject. My friend , you have various field in which you can do better.

I giving you some of the options: 1. Best of luck. Dear Friend, Physics is one of the best as well as little more tough and very interesting subject for a Science student.

Mathematical potion as well as the basic concept of the physics is much more Math is basic language of physics,without Math ,physics is incomplete. Mathematics related,so Math and Physics are very important together, since Physics is complete subject with Physics as well as Mathematics". As you have interest in physics,then I will go to complete the B.

SC and then Ph. D with mathematics. However,as you have passed with biology ,then there are some courses like Bio-Physics,Geo-Physics etc Good luck. Sorry friend, you can not take physics as your main subject for further studies. But you can definitely take physics as your optional paper and make a prosperous career in some different areas. But you can try for the following course :- 1 You can go for JEM exam if you have biology in 12th.

Good Day. Since physics is your favourite subject and you really want to persue it without maths as your basic subject ,then you can do research is branches of applied physics such as Geophysics or as you have biology as your subject you can also persue biophysics ars your career option Good luck!!

My dear friend without Maths in B. Sc it is not possible to make a career in Physics. U can take Physics as optional subject. To make a bright career try some other fields. Good Luck Physics , Chemistry , and Mathematics all are related to each other..

So my request to you choose Physics but not without math , because if you choose this type of combination then you will face problem..

So from this section i alert you.. Hi, You can pursue BSc. After that go for MSc. This is the best future study plan in the field of Physics. Originally Posted by Unregistered. Then show U mark-sheet that U have passed math paper in 10 2 along with the mark-sheet of 10 2 Science. After that U can carry on Ur study to higher level as much as U want. Of course you can do. But if you know little mathematics it is very very interesting.

Hi dear, for exploring a prosperous career in the field of Physics you have to opt for much higher level of studies say-P. Im doin commerce london sylubus, and i have done Accounting, mathematics core-mathematics with statistics doing econ I did science for my o level, and for some reason i choose commerce in A level, finding hard to do econ..

I love to engineering An analogy might be being able to read French poetry and getting something out of it versus being able to create decent French poetry yourself. In the program I studied, you ended up coming out of a physics major with enough math to have a minor in math automatically, and with 4 or 5 extra high-level math courses in anyway you could tack Math on as a double major—this was quite common.

As it is, there is a lot I have to take on faith when I read about quantum mechanics… you basically have to abandon everything you know about logic to even BEGIN to understand it and I hardly have, and have studied it frankly way more than I should, all things considered. Even in the first semester of study, you will do a LOT of advanced trigonometry, geometry, equation derivation, and calculus.

Vector calculation, springs, and buoyancy all require good math skills to calculate and understand—and those topics comprise basic first-semester study. The books are outdated published in the 70s , which shows, but they are still wonderful reads for laypersons. Fact is, mathematics is how a lot of science describes the world. And you need that in physics. Blunder through the math however you can. A lot of it gets abstract.

Bastard ended up getting a degree in Mathematics with like zero effort. No, that amount of prerequisite math in a physics B. We had three semesters of calculus, one of ordinary differential equations, one of vector and tensor analysis, partial differential equations, linear algebra, and then a three set of electives—usually introductory statistics, functional analysis, and some kind of nonlinear theory or numerical methods, although the more enthusiastic students would go in for topology or advanced calculus—which exceeded the minimum requirements for a minor degree in mathematics by several credits, and this was at a land grant state system university.

I knew one that was doubling in philosophy, but he dropped out to wander the world like Kwai Chang Caine or something. As for the o. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle. ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here. Support Our Journalism.

This may home your readers into the idea it is female students who may be without a good foundation in maths and physics, unable to manage the demands. I hope this was an unconscious editorial choice but one that should be reflected on and considered in the context of your portrayl of female students and future scientists. India need technicians with good skills rather than engineers. Highly skilled technicians can replace engineers in India.

TLM restored. Look likes you believe and have taken for granted that a student will move to second year without studying PCM in the first year of Engineering. A student doing engineering in bioinformatics, biochemistry and many other subjects just need to know basic Mathematics and primary knowledge of physics.

I have never heard such stupidity. Engineering without maths and physics is just setting up the world to fall to pieces. This reform was necessary in view of the changing times and NEP.

Compulsory maths at 12th. Class level for engineering level was causing problem to thousands of students! Particularly to boys who opt for biology studies with only intention to study medicine and drop maths so that they are not unduly burdened in their preparations.

NEP envisages real universities, bringing all the disciplines under one umbrella, a liberal and flexible credit selection for award of degrees! The students would always have choice to do additional required credits in maths if they desire to study core engineering requiring high level maths! In a world of open learning , this is a good approach.

These students learned maths and science till 10th. Critics assume that entire maths and physics topics are learned during intermediate education. To learn engineering and practice it we need maths and science knowledge but it is not necessary to learn prior to joining engineering course. Students can learn those things when required..

Good command over these subjects from a very early age can be very fruitful in enhancing their comprehension ability, hence they will be becoming intelligent brain in future.

Similar to other countries like USA, Canada there should be an exam after graduation conducted by professional bodies to grant Professional engineer licence like PE or P. Eng for practice. If Mathematics and Physics is going to be optional for Engineering, why not allow arts students to enter engineering colleges? The Sanskrit scholars will be more appropriate, as our ancestors had put our enginnering skills in sanskrit.

To think engineering without mathematics and physics is similar to medical College entry without biology as pre graduate level. The problem that needs to be addressed is at the exit level, not the entry level. The criteria are pretty much flexible at MTech and Ph. But the job recruitment in the eminent institutes or core sectors is still tied to the branch of BTech inspite of evolving multidisciplinary world and years of research experience in the field.

So, while anyone can learn what they want, they are not being considered for jobs in the traditional engineering branches. In fact, in the first year, they gave a course in all the 3 subjects.

Our entrance exams test the candidates in a very stressful way. What us to be tested in the entrance is whetgrr the candidate has the necessary ability to study Engg. Physics taught in 11th is essential for mechanical. And physics in 12 is needed for electrical…. There are some comments about AI and software engineering not requiring maths or physics. AI runs on ML algorithms written based on class 11 and 12 maths.

Many software problems are coded using physics as base knowledge where interaction with real machines happens. A by-product of learning maths and physics is enhancement in analytical and logical thinking capabilities which are the backbone of engineering. Any student can learn and pass engineering but can he think and solve problems is the crux. No wonder so many are unemployable as they have reduced it to getting marks.

And diluting this further will increase unemployment. Only beneficiaries are engineering colleges which can fill seats by throwing all doors open. It is also not forcing them to mandatorily teach a bridge course. What is the fuss then? Which engineering college would accept these students then? Warning bells for maths and physics teachers in engineering colleges. Already chemistry has been ignored in engineering syllabi.

The Engineering Education we have had so far has catered to the needs of an Industrial Age. From an era when teachers and books were the only source of knowledge to students, we are into the times when AI is aiding learners in adaptive and personalized learning, utilizing sources of knowledge that are completely democratized. Education is evolving from learner proving the retention of knowledge in the head to get a degree, to demonstrate capability of using head, heart and hands, for doing something innovative or meeting an unmet need.

There are evidences in the form of Diploma students completing their Degree course successfully, even with comparably weak foundation in these two subjects. That a student must study Physics and Mathematics- only in the classroom, only from a qualified teacher, only from an approved institution- is a thing of past. Instead of worrying about theory available online , institutions must focus of experiential learning and prepare them as lifelong learners.

Mathematics is a box with multiple tools and various models of problem-solving. It is a very useful resource to find rational and relevant solutions for various problems, of mathematical, physical, biological, astronomy, engineering, etc… The results obtained have always been of quality. Thus, one has always required mathematical models to study, understand, analyze and predict the outcome of an Engineering action or a natural phenomenon.

It was definitely NOT removed from curriculum study during my engineering study. The broad basing of entry level qualifications is akin to opening the front doors for accepting the students who were erstwhile progressing as lateral entries or getting the equivalence status through allied domains. Suffice to say, a stagnancy in education is a sign for its devaluation as much as it facilitates the progression. The National Education Policy provides a spark for this change with its abundant inclusivity proposals.

If such were the case, the theory of conservatism would have prohibited growth in the first place itself.